Translate

Saturday, November 21, 2020

New from the Center for Immigration Studies, 11/16/20

Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Featured Blogs 
Latinos in South Texas Voted Against Illegal Immigration and CBP Demonization: Many rejected the narrative that a 'racist' president hated them
By Todd Bensman
Largely unreported in the national press is that hundreds of thousands of Latino voters in rural Texas — the sons and daughters of early legal migration — also felt repulsed by the 2019 mass-migration crisis during which nearly one million illegal Central Americans swamped the border as Democratic voices encouraged it, litigated efforts to staunch the tide, and promised open gates under a Biden administration.

Has the GOP Agenda Shifted?: And, if so, what it means for immigration
By Andrew R. Arthur
Sean Trende — the senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics — published an article last week captioned "The Future of the GOP Is Trumpy". Trende made some interesting points therein, and if he is correct, his thesis will have significant implications for immigration policy going forward.

How Immigration Has Transformed the Electorate, 2000 to 2020
By Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler
Analysis of Census Bureau data shows that the population of adult immigrants and their adult U.S.-born children has grown dramatically, but unevenly, across the country since 2000 as a share of eligible voters. New Jersey, Texas, Maryland, California, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina in particular have experienced dramatic increases in the share of eligible voters who are immigrants or their children.

The Knock-On Impacts of Trump's Immigration Policies in the Years Ahead
By David North
These restricting factors will stay with us for several years, though they may be overshadowed by a large amnesty or a massive increase in refugee numbers. But, as my colleague Steven Camarota wrote recently, international migration is not an uncontrollable phenomenon — policy matters.

 

More Blog Posts
Donate
Facebook
https://twitter.com/CIS_org
Google Plus
LinkedIn
RSS
Copyright © 2020 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved. 

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

View this e-mail in your browser.
 

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Daily Digest Bulletin

DHS Proposes to Limit Work Permits for Aliens with Final Orders of Removal

WASHINGTON—The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) today announced a proposed rule that would limit discretionary work authorization for aliens who have final orders of removal and who have been temporarily released from DHS custody on an order of supervision (OSUP). The rule would align the issuance of discretionary employment authorization with the administration’s priorities to protect U.S. workers and strengthen immigration enforcement.

Orders of supervision allow DHS to place conditions on and monitor aliens with final orders of removal who have been temporarily released from DHS custody until DHS has the travel documents necessary to remove the alien from the United States. The OSUP contains several conditions for release, including a requirement that aliens cooperate with efforts to procure the travel documents for removal, check in with DHS on designated dates, and present themselves for removal once it is arranged.

“Authorizing employment benefits to aliens who have already had due process and have been ordered removed by the U.S. government undermines the rule of law and weakens DHS enforcement and removal operations,” said USCIS Deputy Director for Policy Joseph Edlow. “This effort would also remove the economic incentive for these aliens to not cooperate in the effort to obtain travel documents to return to their home countries.”

Under current regulations, an alien who has a final order of removal and who is temporarily released from DHS custody on an OSUP is generally eligible for an employment authorization document (EAD). This creates a disincentive for the alien to depart or cooperate with their home country to obtain travel documents to depart the United States. These aliens have used substantial government resources throughout the removal process and have ultimately been ordered removed from the United States by an immigration judge.

Under the proposed rule, only a small subset of these aliens who can demonstrate that DHS has determined that their removal from the United States is impracticable would remain eligible for discretionary employment authorization. DHS will require such aliens to establish economic necessity to work, consistent with other discretionary EAD categories, and USCIS will assess whether they warrant a favorable exercise of discretion for a grant of employment authorization.  In addition, aliens who qualify for discretionary employment authorization under the proposed rule and subsequently seek to renew their work authorization would also be required to establish that their employer participates in E-Verify and is in good standing in the program.

The proposed rule also would limit the validity period of the employment authorization for aliens released on an OSUP to one year, regardless of whether it is an initial or a renewal employment authorization. When a final rule is published, the changes made by the rule will apply to initial and renewal applications filed on or after the final rule’s effective date. Aliens who are employment-authorized prior to the final rule’s effective date will remain employment authorized until the expiration date on their EAD, unless the EAD is terminated or revoked. The final rule also would not affect applications to replace EADs granted before the final rule’s effective date.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow them on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis) and LinkedIn (/uscis).

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

New from the Center for Immigration Studies, 9/21/20


Commentary
Kamala's Amnesty
And Republicans handed it to her.

By Mark Krikorian
National Review, September 18, 2020

Excerpt: Late last year, the Republican Senate approved, and President Trump signed into law, the means for a future Democratic president to grant unilateral amnesty to virtually the entire illegal population — and get away with it.

It's called "parole in place." As my colleague Andrew Arthur explained last year, parole in place is a tool concocted by the Obama administration, based on legal contortions by the general counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration. As such, it had no basis in law.

Featured Posts
BIA Decision Will Streamline Asylum Application Process
By Andrew R. Arthur
On August 31, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed an appeal filed by an alien ordered removed after he failed to file an asylum application within a deadline set by an immigration judge (IJ). The BIA also found that the proceedings, which were held via video teleconference (VTC) did not deprive the alien of his due-process rights. That decision will streamline the asylum application process by setting a precedent that court-ordered deadlines must be met, but it also delineates a series of safeguards to ensure alien respondents' rights are protected in the process.

A Ninth Circuit Panel Says that Sometimes 'Temporary' May in Fact Mean Temporary
By Dan Cadman
Is a president forever and always obliged to hew to the course (and live by the mistakes) of his predecessors? While the instant matter may involve immigration, that's really what's at stake. This, too, was the heart of the DACA controversy that the highest court so recently flubbed.

 
Maryland Gang Murder Suspects Were Shielded From ICE by Locals: 'This is the worst-case scenario when detainers are not honored'
By Marguerite Telford
ICE announced that it has issued detainers on three of five MS-13 gang members now in custody in Baltimore County, Md., after their arrest for the murder of a 16-year old Long Island girl, whose body was found in a wooded area in Cockeysville, Md. Two of the gang members flagged by ICE were previously in the custody of authorities after local arrests, but were released, and in one case this was due to a local sanctuary policy.

EB-5 Investor-Visa Violations in Vermont Draw Further Substantial Punishments
By David North
The most recent example of the enforcement rigor is written into the plea agreement that Miami developer Ariel Quiros signed with the U.S. attorney's office last month. Quiros, 64, pleaded guilty to three federal charges in return for a promise from the feds that they would not seek more than 97 months (eight years and one month) in prison for him.
More Blog Posts 
Donate

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Daily Digest Bulletin

USCIS to Provide Contract Interpreters for Asylum Interviews - Temporary Rule to Help Reduce Spread of COVID-19

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced a temporary final rule to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19) by using government-contracted telephonic interpreters for affirmative asylum interviews at no cost to the applicant.

This temporary final rule changes for the next 180 days the requirement that asylum applicants who do not speak English must bring an interpreter to their affirmative asylum interview. Under the modified regulation, USCIS will temporarily require applicants to proceed with a USCIS contract interpreter, provided the applicant is fluent in one of the 47 different languages available.

The government-contracted interpreters will be provided at no cost to asylum applicants. The interpreters are carefully vetted and tested and must pass rigorous background checks as well as meet a high standard of competency. The contract interpreters already regularly serve as interpreters for border screening interviews and act as interpreter monitors or occasionally serve as the primary interpreter during affirmative asylum interviews. 

Asylum applicants who are unable to proceed with the interview in English or any of the available languages listed must continue to provide their own interpreter.

The temporary rule will amend existing Department of Homeland Security regulations for 180 days and goes into effect on Sept. 23. On March 23, 2021, asylum applicants unable to proceed with the interview in English will again be required to provide their own interpreter. 

For more information, read the temporary final rule published in the Federal Register on Sept. 23.

For more information on USCIS and our programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis), and LinkedIn (/uscis).